Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Liberal Hypocrisy’ Category

Bitch. Whore. Stupid. Hot. Disabled. Shrill. Mean Girl. Hag. Diva. Ice Queen. Slut.

 

The midterm elections of 2010 brought back a familiar rage and sick, queasy feeling as I watched women on both sides of the aisle being devalued with sexist diatribes. The hateful rhetoric that defined much of the 2008 presidential campaign was not an anomaly. When debating the merits of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy detractors could no longer say, “I don’t mind electing a woman – just not that woman.” Such a phrase was nonsense after all. Plenty of women seem somehow to be that woman. Though not seeking political office, even Michelle Obama did not escape. Once called angry and emasculating, she now tills a victory garden in designer jeans and Lanvin sneakers.  Sarah Palin, derided as reactionary and “disabled,” seems a terrifying prospect to the left and even some on the right.

 

But none can compete with the twenty years of skewering Hillary Clinton has endured. In 2008, the breathtaking atmosphere surrounding Hillary and Obama’s first solo debate captured the imagination and hopes of millions, but my joy in watching a qualified woman vie for the presidency was marred by newsmen and pundits calling Hillary Clinton a hellish housewife, Nurse Ratched, she-devil and bitch.

 

Not content to take the word of the pundit class on Hillary’s character, I sought the reality under the damaging “divisive and polarizing” label that had long haunted her. Hillary Clinton’s accomplishments and tireless work ethic proved that she was not the harridan of pundits’ fantasies. I ignored my scattershot but steady career as an actor to work on Hillary’s campaign. That career was nothing fancy but I’d made a living in the business for many years. The only calling I have ever had or loved became an inconvenient distraction.

 

Did I want Hillary to win because she was a woman? No. Did I want her to win because I thought she had the best chops for the job? Yes. She was my candidate. But the long knives were out for Hillary, the media bias appalling. Her party turned a deaf ear and stood by as her policies were misrepresented, her character maligned, her womanhood degraded. The net result was to make me work harder.

 

Through my passion for Hillary’s candidacy, I evolved from actor and fearful news junkie to determined campaign grunt and citizen pundit. If you told me I would immerse myself in this effort, become a blog writer for the first time in my life, build a following on various political websites under the name “Ani” and write a book on the subject that I am currently working to get published, I would have said you were potzo.

 

In 2008, my reluctant odyssey into the world of politics forced me to examine the way women are treated in a post-feminist world. Especially women with high aims and hard heads. I questioned the bias against women in authority, the limitations women placed on themselves, my own preconceptions about party, my choice of career, and even some of my friendships.

 

The fever of that campaign is still with me for one reason only — as a society, we have learned nothing. We still practice the same behavior.

 

Speaking out on the internet, I raised my volume well past my comfort level. At the time, hiding my real name felt like a necessity. While I didn’t want my politics to interfere with my work as an actor, far more worrisome were the threats leveled at some of Hillary’s supporters. One friend received internet death threats. Another had someone vandalize her garage door painting “Hillary hag” on it for having a Hillary lawn sign in her yard. I read that a woman with a small Hillary sign in her car window was followed by a man in another car for blocks. When the man caught up with her, he screamed, “You can put up all the signs you want. That bitch will never be president.”

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

© 2010 TexasDarlin/TDBlog

“There is no excuse for this in America…”

One of my die-hard Dem siblings loves to trash FOX News, but truthfully he’s never watched it. I understand. I used to be a member of the Liberal Hypocrisy Club myself. It wasn’t until the mainstream liberal media made Hillary-bashing a habitual art form in 2008 that I turned to FOX in desperation, and thereupon made a humble discovery: FOX News, liberal broadcasting enemy #1, is actually fair and balanced. Regular appearances on FOX by Juan Williams, Alan Colmes, and other liberal commentators consistently prove it. CNN just pretends to be balanced and MSNBC long ago became Obama’s obnoxious mouthpiece. I just wonder how many Liberal Hypocrites reciting the “FOX is right-wing” Oba-mantra, like my brother, have ever watched a FOX news program from start to finish.

As a former lifelong Dem I have spent many thousands of hours listening to National Public Radio over the decades and have contributed during their pledge drives more than once. Despite my political metamorphosis of 2008, I have continued to tune in regularly, flipping the dial between NPR and AM talk.

Sadly, no more. Yesterday I re-programmed the car radio to turn off NPR permanently. I no longer tolerate Liberal Hypocrisy, and NPR has demonstrated once and for all that its “journalistic standards” meme is just another term for left-wing censorship.

While NPR openly promotes “teabagger bashing,” it incredulously has a zero-tolerance policy for anyone on its payroll who expresses a politically incorrect thought out loud — even when that person does so in a non-NPR venue — such as, a genuine fear of Islamic terrorism in the wake of the 9/11 Islamic attack on our soil.

Silly me…I thought progressives should be….er….progressive, and perhaps encourage dialogue that includes dissenting ideas. But yesterday we saw first hand that NPR doesn’t walk the progressive walk. By firing Juan Williams for the offense of uttering a feeling widely shared by Americans, NPR has acted in the spirit of Fascism, as far away from “progress” as a news organization could stray.

“All things considered,” we now know really means “all things considered so long as we approve the script.” Shamelessly, NPR executives don’t object when its analysts appear on other programs to offer opinions that prop up liberals.

I’ll take FOX News any day over NPR, and I challenge all my liberal friends and relatives to take a sick day and watch FOX News programs from morning to night (well, skip Beck if you wish). I bet you’ll be surprised by what you see.

Juan Williams will continue to be a political commentator with integrity, and NPR will be destroyed by its own fascist intolerance.

I don’t always agree with Bill O’Reilly, but this is the word:

UPDATE:

Stanley Kurtz makes a valid request….

National Public Radio gave a very warm welcome to David Remnick when he published his biography of President Obama. As a news outlet that makes a place for all political views, I’ve asked the publicity department at Simon & Schuster’s Threshold editions to try to book an appearance for me on NPR to discuss my new book, Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism. I’ve appeared on the Diane Rehm show in the past, and a couple of times on national NPR radio. I look forward to NPR’s response.

Read Full Post »

From the pro-Obama liberals….nothing but crickets.

Wednesday’s lead op-ed in The Wall Street Journal illuminates the true motives of Democrats who support the “transparency” of corporate political donations. In the case of Target, liberals led by MoveOn.org bullied Target into withdrawing its contributions to an independent political group which used such funds to run ads about a Republican candidate’s pro-business positions. It so happens that the candidate also opposed gay marriage, thus launching the hostile anti-Target tirade. The tragic twist is that Target has an exemplary record of standing up for gay rights:

The attack on Target was especially dishonest because of the company’s history on gay issues, which includes sponsoring gay pride events and offering benefits to domestic partners. Only months before, the company received a 100% score on Human Rights Campaign’s 2010 Corporate Equality Index, which rates companies on sexual preference policies in the workplace.

As a “by the way” side note, the op-ed mentions that President BoBo and his sidekick V.P. Bide-Me also oppose gay marriage.

No kidding. I suspect that this Journal edition went to print prior to the discovery that the Obama Administration filed an appeal “in support of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, that barred gay marriages….”

Let’s review today’s Liberal Hypocrisy Lesson:

Democrats led by the White House take a vociferous faux-righteous stand in favor of disclosing political donations. Liberal friends of the White House wage a public war against Target, which boasts a model record of pro-gay policies and practices, for donating money to a pro-business Republican candidate who also opposes gay marriage. The attack succeeds in silencing Target. Meanwhile, President BoBo’s Administration files an appeal to uphold a law that would ban gay marriage. And from the liberal pro-Obama hypocrites, we hear in response nothing but crickets.

As for the slimy motives of ObamaLand’s attack on corporate political donations, the Journal concludes:

Maryland State Senator Jamie Raskin, who is seeking similar legislation for his state, recently gave the game away by declaring that “The public’s right of boycott is the final check against corporate dominance over our politics.” In other words, the point of disclosure is not to inform the voting public. It is to turn corporate donors into political piñatas, embarrass them publicly, hurt their business—and ultimately convince them that the price of donating to non-liberal groups is too high.

Other companies also gave to MN Forward, but Target seems to have been singled out for its national profile to send other businesses a message. Target declined to answer our queries, though other sources tell us the company has stopped giving to MN Forward since it was mugged by the left. Other companies on the cusp of donating also declined once they saw what happened to Target.

That’s a shame because it means Democrats and the left are succeeding in their attempt to silence business voices—unless, like Peter Lewis or Goldman Sachs executives, they support Democrats. The next time you hear a Democrat claim to favor “disclosure,” keep in mind that what he really wants is more political Target practice.

Liberal hypocrisy raining down.

Read Full Post »

Trump, who supported Hillary Clinton first, then John McCain, is not only a smart businessman but he’s a stellar patriot….

His offer includes a condition that the Imam won’t build a mosque within 5 blocks of this site:

Via Fox News New York

Go Donald Go!

Read Full Post »

From Merriam-Webster:

A Twit is “a silly or annoying person: a fool”

Gail Collins today in the Times, writing on Sarah Palin:

Her staff says this means nothing whatsoever, but let us acknowledge that Palin is on a roll. She’s got her own TV show, not counting Fox News. And she twitters! Or somebody does it for her. Hard to tell which. Her twit on the president’s Iraq speech was: “may make u want to dig out ur old Orwell books so rewritten history can be deciphered.”

Did you catch that? She called her a twit. Hilarious. F’ing hilarious.

The verb is tweet, and that was no accident. Because, you know, a woman from NASCAR America must be a twit, according to the narrative of Whole Foods Nation. Collins gets away with classism/sexism, but has no problem calling Obama’s opponents racists.

Read Full Post »

(image is Normal Rockwell’s “Freedom of Speech” found here)

On Saturday, at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., we witnessed the birth of a new movement. And it has the potential to be revolutionary.

Glenn Beck has always been over-the-top for my tastes and his tearful moments make me squirm, but I have to admit that he’s a master communicator — particularly of others’ ideas.

Patrick Buchanan sensed that Obama was losing the middle after Scott Brown’s victory nearly a year ago with an op-ed titled “Has Obama Lost White America?”

I don’t think of it as “white America” but rather the great swath of moderates of all colors: those who pay more to the government than they receive in benefits; those who dislike the Ground Zero Mosque — not because they are bigots — but because they can read the political cues being sent by Imam Feisal Abdul Raul and his clique – and the fact that it does have a whiff of triumphalism about it; those who send their children to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They know the liberal elites hate them, and Obama is a product of their post-American worldview. His statement prior to the Pennsylvania primary is almost a parody of their dislike for the Great Middle:

And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

And, true to his word, Obama has put the interests of illegal aliens over the safety of American citizens, he sided with Skip Gates over the Cambridge police, and he apologized for our country and insulted her people until he’s alienated nearly everyone. He is acting against the interests of most Americans, and against the symbols and history we value. A he’s awoken a sleeping giant.

Insensate blogger Digby, in an overt statement of anti-white racism, describes the Restoring Honor rally as such:

The Triumph of the Wingnut rally appears to be a big success. It’s a beautiful day, the all white audience is in lawn chairs clapping politely as they give out medals to people of color on the stage. The faithful seem a little bit bored, but you can’t blame them. They’re looking for inspiration and this isn’t the kind of thing that inspired these folks. I assume the red meat is yet to come.

[Snip]

I just keep thinking that I sure hope all these very pink skinned, middle aged folks are wearing sun screen.

This hatred for fellow citizens based on their skin color is a rampant disease running through the Left. It is a class-based elitism masquerading as a concern for minorities. But the truth is that is the cosmic power struggle of Whole Foods Nation against NASCAR America.

In the WSJ on Sunday, James Taranto writes “Why liberal elites find Americans revolting” and how the elites don’t understand the discomfort with the GZ mosque:

The Ground Zero mosque is an affront to the sensibilities of ordinary Americans. “The center’s association with 9/11 is intentional and its location is no geographic coincidence,” as the Associated Press has reported. That Americans would find this offensive is a matter of simple common sense. The liberal elites cannot comprehend common sense, and, incredibly, they think that’s a virtue. After all, common sense is so common.

The British philosopher Roger Scruton has coined a term to describe this attitude: oikophobia. Xenophobia is fear of the alien; oikophobia is fear of the familiar: “the disposition, in any conflict, to side with ‘them’ against ‘us’, and the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture and institutions that are identifiably ‘ours.’ ” What a perfect description of the pro-mosque left.

Glenn Beck has captured a mood and a moment in reaction against the elites’ war against the Great Middle, and against the snobbery towards Americans who view the GZ Mosque as a taunt.

Race-baiter Al Sharpton, at his pathetic counter rally, perfectly symbolized the disgust most Americans have with the stale politics of resentment and anti-Americanism. Further, the NAACP’s Ben Jealous claimed that Beck’s enormous crowd would not applaud Martin Luther King’s “Dream” speech, which is ludicrous on its face. The race-baiting goes on and on. Accusing your political opponents of racism without evidence is not like racism, it is racism. The “Left” has morphed into the biggest purveyors of racism in years.

Finally, Charles Blow, the Times’ enumerate blogger, says that Glenn Beck has committed a rhetorical assassination of Martin Luther King. Clearly, the Left has jumped the couch.

Despite the Left’s frenzied attempts to label all of their opponents as racists, Beck’s rally was a massive success which proclaimed old-fashioned values of God and country, an attitude which is in sharp contrast with the filth being thrown at them. This message was clear and concise, and it cut through the clutter into the homes and cafes where the Great Middle contemplate the direction of our country.

The hysterics of the Left indicate to me their level of fear: long gone are the chants of “Yes, we can!” Race-baiting has been turned to an earsplitting decibel. The Great Middle is increasingly moving towards the Republicans. Gallup gives the GOP their highest poll numbers in 68 years. NASCAR Nation is ascendent.

(Glenn Beck’s new Web site, The Blaze, is here)

Read Full Post »

Teacher gets fired for creating a song on his own private time that is critical of Democrats, but America-hating Imam has unqualified freedom of religion!

I was a loyal liberal Democrat all of my life, until May 31, 2008, when the Democratic Party cooked the nomination for Barack Obama at the expense of the top vote-getter, Hillary Rodham Clinton.  It’s hard to believe that I spent decades in liberal hypocrisy mode. Never again:

Middle-school football coach, Bryan Miller, was fired after liberals complained about his YouTube song, “When You’re Holding a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail,” which he wrote and produced pursuant to the First Amendment guarantee of free speech, on his own time as a private citizen….and not on the school clock.

Sorry, Mr. Miller, no constitutional rights for you because you criticized The One. Had your song been called, “When You’re Building a Mosque at Ground Zero, Every Nail is Sacred,” you could have kept your job. Tough lesson.

Good song, by the way:

h/t Ace.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers