And they haven’t even campaigned there yet!
A new Public Policy Polling survey gives McCain a 5-point lead in Florida, up from 3. He’s now at 50%, to 45% for Obama.
“Barack Obama has dropped a few points each time we’ve polled Florida over the course
of the summer,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “Virginia and
Colorado may end up as the states more critical to his Electoral College strategy this fall
if the trend continues.”
Yikes! Virginia and Colorado? I just heard a FOX report on how very very difficult it would be for Barry to wrest Virginia out of the RED column…
Yep, Barry should have followed his own advice…
First and foremost Texas Darlin, let me say you are an American Patriot and although I am Republican, I have a great deal of respect for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton who I actually saw in Coral Gables in May….
Thank you for exposing B. Hussein Obama for what he truly is!!!
As a native of Miami, let me tell that the Sunshine State will vote for McCain, just like we did in January 29th, when we defeated another charlatan, Slick Mitt Romney!!!
Here’s a great new video. I am a sucker for this patriotic stuff.
The good news just keeps coming!
Read this article. It’s priceless:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/medias_treatment_of_palin_and.html
Thought I’d give you some updates.
I am proud to say, that not only was I the first to prove that Obama’s COLB image is a forgery, I’m the only one who did it honestly. And, that’s why I’m still standing.
Lastly, the idiots at FactCheck perpetuated an even more elaborate fraud by creating phony photographs of Obama’s paper COLB. Yes, friends, that is correct. Any way you look at it — be it logically or graphically, you cannot have one be a forgery and the other one NOT be a forgery.
I mean, you have to be really out-to-lunch to believe anything that Obama’s buddies at Annenberg, who own Factcheck, say. Did they show these “new” photos to ANYONE outside their den of thieves?
NOT ON YOUR LIFE.
FACTCHECK claims that the scanned image they posted on June 16 was made from the one they photographed.
What is really sad is that once-respected Internet dailies like WorldNetDaily.com bought into it, too. hook, line and stinker.
I’ve got a whole section devoted to debunking the photos, irrespective and independent of the bogus scanned image.
You cannot have a forged image scan made from a “real Obama COLB” (allegedly photographed by FactCheck stooges)
You cannot have a “real Obama COLB” (allegedly photographed by FactCheck stooges) be the source of a forged image scan.
Either they are both real (no chance in Hell), or they are both bogus (where the smart money is).
I’ve called all of them out. I told them to put their money where their mouth is, to put their gold where their grille is, to run for “Pinks.” Anything, to get them to bite.
Let’s just say that they are smart ednough NOT to take a sucker bet.
If any of you hear anyone spouting off about Obama’s COLB being genuine, tell them that I’ve got a lovely bridge I’d like to sell them.
My FINAL report will be out soon, and I’ve already promised to make it easy for the layperson to understand. It will summarize three months of intensive, investigative research that would have earned me about $100,000 if I could have charged my normal consulting fee to someone.
What a bargain!
I will never rest until I am vindicated.
And, you can take that to the bank!
Yours devotedly,
Ron Polarik,
Debunker-In-Chief
Hey Ron, I for one really appreciate your work and I’m really looking forward to your next report. I’ve been a supporter of Phil Berg, and have been keeping in touch with him regarding progress with his case. Phil will probably need your expert witness testimony/evidence when the time comes. Keep up the great work; all real Americans appreciate your efforts to expose the truth!
polarik said: “…$100,000 if I could have charged my normal consulting fee to someone.”
This does not seem to be your area of expertise. Your entire biography on TownHall is:
“I am a computer programmer and web designer.”
Mr. Big~ What makes you think that ‘polarik’ qualifies as “an expert witness”? Expert witnesses must produce credentials and proof of their expertise in the field.
polarik said: “… I (was) the first to prove that Obama’s COLB image is a forgery”
That is still very much being debated, even over at Free Republic. While there are many questions and suspicions about the creepy behavior of BO and his campaign and their connections to factcheck, there is no consensus at all that it is “proven” to be fake.
Certainly, BO could simply sign a release today, on his own, to have a certified copy of his original birth certificate sent directly to the judge. Hopefully, the judge will make such an order.
Here’s yestreday’s actual radio podcast interview with Phillip Berg who filed the lawsuits in regards to Obama’s fake everything including the birth certificate:
http://www.replay-video.com/guide/index.php?start_page=http://applian.com/guide/view_podcast_details.php?show_id=33996
Obama, Dems sharpen personal attacks on Palin
By JIM VANDEHEI & MIKE ALLEN | 9/9/08 6:40 PM EST Text Size:
Sarah Palin is drawing heavy criticism from Democrats.
Photo: AP
Barack Obama and his Democratic allies are intensifying their attacks on Sarah Palin, as her sustained and surprising central role in this race is upending Obama’s strategy and often overshadowing McCain.
Democratic Congressman Russ Carnahan on Tuesday – introducing Joe Biden at a campaign event – ripped into Palin’s record and punctuated it with this snarky jab. “There’s no way you can dress up that record, even with a lot of lipstick,” he said. Later in the day, Obama used a variation of the lipstick line, though he was clearly talking about the McCain-Palin reform rhetoric. “You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said. “It’s still a pig.”
Former New York Mayor Ed Koch, as part of his endorsement of Obama, said Palin “scares the hell out of me.” And Obama hit Palin in nearly a dozen different press releases – one day after drawing laughs at a campaign stop by calling her a “moose shooter.”
It isn’t just Democratic officials who are fixated on Palin. Media outlets on the left – from Talking Points Memo to Huffington Post – are loaded with hard-hitting stories about Palin. McCain often seems like he’s playing second fiddle.
“On the stump, not a single word that comes out of her mouth – or not a single word that the McCain folks put in her mouth – is anything but a lie,” wrote TPM’s Josh Marshall. “I know that sounds like hyperbole. But just go down the list. None of them bear out.”
I hope the Nigerian scandal will stop Obama’s presidential campaign.Any minute of the day or night I will vote for McCain/Palin ticket. I believe they will win and Obama won’t be’ FOR THE WORLD” as Dr,Okereke Onyiuke, Obama Nigerian fundraiser said. Good God stop him.
Ellie Wyatt said:
“polarik said: “…$100,000 if I could have charged my normal
“consulting fee to someone.”
“This does not seem to be your area of expertise. Your entire biography on TownHall is ‘I am a computer programmer and web designer.”
And, that’s a concern?? The last two people to post very impressive resumes were TechDude and Neal Krawetz, two hacks that have less combined experience in graphics and research than I have in my little finger.
Either you know this stuff, or you don’t, and so far, I’ve yet to hear even one of my critics correctly tell me what “scanner artifacts” look like.
Polarik~
It doesn’t particularly concern me, but it might concern Mr. Big, who seems to believe that you are capable of presenting “expert witness testimony/evidence”.
I don’t see how TechDude or Krawetz have anything to do with your claimed expertise.
“…less combined experience in graphics and research than I have in my little finger”
Well, that sure is impressive! I don’t know anything about “TechDude”, but Dr. Krawetz does seem to have quite a resume, including authoring two books and co-authoring others:
The company, Hacker Factor, was established in 2002 by Dr. Neal Krawetz.
Neal Krawetz holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Texas A&M University and a Bachelors degree in Computer and Information Science from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Dr. Neal Krawetz operates Hacker Factor Solutions (www.hackerfactor.com) and specializes in non-classical computer forensics, online profiling, and computer security. His research into anti-anonymity technologies combines fields as vast as ergonomics and child development to artificial intelligence and theoretical biophysics.
He is the author of Introduction to Network Security (Charles River Media, 2006) and Hacking Ubuntu (Wiley, 2007).
His work experience spans small startup companies, academic and university environments, and large Fortune-100 corporations.
Computer Security (20+ years). Auditing systems and software for potential exploits, evaluating and assessing risk potentials, developing security-oriented solutions, tracing remote intruders, tracking undesirable email (Spam) sources, and training non-security-oriented software engineers. This work includes computer forensics and profiling.
Software Development (25+ years). Custom software architecture, design, and development. Previous projects include large-scale e-commerce servers, web robots, VPN solutions, automated cryptanalysis tools, radio harmonic analysis, and billing systems.
Computer Networking (15+ years). Recommending and implementing network solutions. Previous projects include numerous network-based software applications, network administration, integration, debugging and troubleshooting, designing solutions for network services and hosting, and physically wiring facilities for network access.
Operating Systems (20+ years). In-depth knowledge covering a variety of operating systems including Unix, Linux, Windows, Macintosh, and other systems. Previous projects include software development, cross-system porting, and system administration.
Dr. Krawetz has presented at many computer conferences on the topics of email and spam, covert communication channels, and computer forensics.
Maybe you would give us some idea of your training, education and experience? I have searched for “Ron Polarik” but find nothing prior to June 16, 2008, and pertaining only to the COLB issue, and you haven’t said anything about your own qualifications except that Dr. Krawetz “is a hack”.
Of course, when the Jakarta school registration was posted here, you did tell us that you are a handwriting expert. Wow. That sure is amazing.
I look forward to seeing something of your professional credentials that would earn you $100,000 that Mr. Big expects you to present in court to qualify yourself as an expert.
Ellie Wyatt:
Weren’t you the one, along with RayAus, who said that I was full of sh*t, and claimed that all I did was to change the date on the Kos COLB image…only to learn later on, that I did, indeed, create a clone of the Kos, but with type fact that had a slight shine on them?
Seems like I was talented enough to fool the two of you.
As I said, Neal Krawetz doesn’t know his asterisk from his elbow about digital image analysis. The closes thing that he may have had in relation to image analysis, was maybe a lecture on steganography – the science of placing and finding data embedded in images.
Let’s see. I’ve been working with computers for 40 years. I’ve been a graphic artist for 50 years. My first “personal computer” was an S-100 I built in 1977, followed by a TRS-80, a Commodore 64, Apple I & II, IBM PC, Original Macintosh, Timex/Sinclair 1000, and lots of IBM and Unix mainframes along the way.
Ive done programming in CP-M, ASP, Basic, Visual Basic, C and its variants, Java, Javascript, VBScript, Plato, DB2, HTML, SPSS, SAS, Minitab, StatPro, and everything Microsoft.
My PhD is in Instructional Media and Experimental Psychology (dual major).
Well, yes, I did lie about my experience. It’s so much greater than I initially reported. I figure that credentials don’t mean squat if you cannot use your brain.
And anyone who has to stoop so low as to start and end their review of my work with ad honimen attacks, is someone who is not as smart as he thinks he is.
I am talking about Krawetz who I quickly silenced by calling him on his claim to use PCA on images. It requires zero gray matter to tell someone that they are full of sh*t, or to say, “Well that proves nothing,” or “I see this, and don’t see that.”
Thye only one among that group of detractors who at least made an effort to provide images to support some of his contentions was Steve.
You certainly didn’t.
RayAus didn’t.
John Q. didn’t.
The Piled High & Deep Krawetz never showed any images either.
These charlatons think that they can get away with uinsubstantiated comments and anecdotal research as being equivalent to my genuine, empirical testing.
What a freakin’ joke!
The problem is that the Obama COLB image was never a true image to begin with, and I’m the only one with the goods to prove it.
What? Don’t believe me?
Name ANY bet you want that I don’t, and I’ll take it in a heartbeat. You can even ask others to get in on the action.
In fact, why don’t you ask the people on this forum on whom they would place their bets? Anyone want a piece of my action is welcome to join me.
People who say, “You haven’t proved anything,” or, “it looks real to me,” don’t have the faintest idea what an image forgery is supposed to look ike — not even if it bit them on the asterisk.
Does anybody here actually believe that Ron Polarik has a PhD in anything?