Obama’s Caucus Fraud Trick: how the delegates were “won” [Updated]

How can the Democratic Delegates to the Denver Convention ignore this evidence?

The delegates know, all too well, that Barack Obama edged out Hillary Clinton in the pledged delegate count largely due to his victories in caucus states.  Obama won 13 out of 14 caucuses, but only 18 out of 39 primaries. 42% of Obama’s wins were caucus states, 95% of Clinton’s wins were primary states.

The Delegates also know that Hillary Clinton was the popular-vote winner. Obama supporters take issue with that conclusion, complaining that there is no way to count the popular vote turn-out in caucus states.

But it’s no mystery why some of the caucus states, such as Texas and Washington, which also held primaries, saw completely mis-matched results.

Obama really needed those caucus wins, didn’t he? And what was his effective caucus strategy?

FRAUD.  The caucus fraud reports are coming out now, and spreading like wildfire. There is no way for Obama to hide from them.

Blogger AnnieNYC posted on Tuesday half of the reports from one city alone, El Paso, and it’s staggering! These are official incident reports. My blog format won’t let me display the full images, so go to AnnieNYC’s site and check them all out. It’s a must-read. Here’s one of six reports posted there (Update: NOTE — the image is cut off but one of the incidents is quoted below):

One of the incidents on this form reads:

“Beckie Redacted reports she saw an Obama person writing “Obama” as a preference for HRC voters where there were blanks in the sign in sheets. The Obama person also tried to turn her away because she did not have a voter card. Temp chair was with Obama. Perm chair is an HRC supporter. People left as Beckie argued for 15 to 20 minutes that the precinct log should be checked. The Obama person shouted an announcement that anyone without a voter card should leave. Delegate count was approx 6 HRC 4 BHO and should have been 8 HRC to 2 BHO since she counted 45 HRC to 15 BHO with a few undecided.”

I wonder how long it will be before ALL the incident reports from ALL CAUCUSES are available…

It seems that Obama is afraid to run against his opponents without unleashing some kind of dirty trick.  Just ask Alice Palmer and the other candidates he had kicked off the ballot in Illinois, to run unopposed in his first election. But it’s one thing to play “hardball” (as CNN put it) by using a technicality to eliminate your opponents. And quite another to win by FRAUD. The latter, of course, is ILLEGAL.

DELEGATES: take note. Obama CHEATED. He would not be the “presumed nominee” without fraudulent caucus victories. NOW, are the delegates going to DO THE RIGHT THING with that information, OR IGNORE IT AND CORONATE THE CHEATER because that’s what is expected of them????

Dr. Lynette Long has conducted extensive research of nationwide caucus fraud by the Obama campaign, all of which can be viewed at her excellent site, LynetteLong.com. Dr. Long concludes:

I’ve spent the past two months immersed in data from the 2008 Democratic caucuses. After studying the procedures and results from all fourteen caucus states, interviewing dozens of witnesses, and reviewing hundreds of personal stories, my conclusion is that the Obama campaign willfully and intentionally defrauded the American public by systematically undermining the caucus process.

This is serious research, folks, and MUST BE acknowledged by the DNC. If Obama is awarded the nomination, and widespread fraud later comes to the attention of the electorate, it will not only further alienate Hillary Democrats (and likely many former Obama supporters) from the party, but will also help drive the nail into Obama’s general-election coffin.

Question for the Delegates and the DNC Leadership: Why are you ignoring this evidence?

Hillary Clinton is the rightful winner of the Democratic nomination.  Ignore that fact at the peril of the party, and the country.